EA Groups Resource Centre
    Home
    πŸ’‘

    Building effective altruism

    Priority ranking
    Understanding
    Related to Readings and resources database (Cause Area)
    to investigate

    Resources to check out

    Building Effective Altruism β†’ article ~21 min
    The highest-impact career paths our research has identified so far β†’ article ~7 min
    No matter your job, here’s 3 evidence-based ways anyone can have a real impact β†’ article ~17 min
    Models of Community Building β†’ article ~3 min

    Notes

    The argument for working on EA

    • lays out the case compellingly:
      • multiplier effect: see more here, with the slightly nuanced lens of "being a multiplier"
      • Keeps your options open if the ideas of EA turn out to be wrong (note that I think that this is also a reason to be careful on working on EA)
      • Neglected

    The argument not to (also from Duda 2017)

    πŸ’‘
    I write below each point the info that I think is likely to affect your likelihood of working on this
    • The ideas of EA are correct, or will be badly implemented (likely to be the the community fails to put the ideas of EA into practice)
      • depends on how much you trust the EA community
      • depends on your model of how the EA community works (see )
    • There is a specific problem that is much more pressing
      • depends on how significant you think longtermism is
    • There is a better opportunity for advocacy
      • depends on how sure you are that a given cause area is the best one
    • There is a better way to gain flexibility
      • depends on how much you think
        • gaining career capital early in career (e.g. by working in a non-EA aligned company) is valuable
        • working on other directly EA internventions gives you flexibility
    • Widespread promotion of the current ideas of effective altruism may be premature (ideas will change)
      • how much will ideas change?

    What sub-tracks are there within working on EA?

    • Being a public intellectual
    • Being involved in operations
      • see
    • Running an EA group
    • Being involved in some large EA non-profit
    • Promoting EA on the side
    • Earn to give to EA orgs

    Cause Prioritization considerations

    • What causes is this cause more important than?
      • I think that there is a strong case to be made, that this is the most important cause area. This argument goes something like
        • Most of the expected value of EA as a movement is in the future, as EA ideas mature
        • Thus, being a community builder who reduces X risk to EA is v high impact because even reducing EA X risk by 0.01% increases expected value a lot
    • What causes could be more important that this?
      • From a high level cause cause comparison perspective, other causes would be more important if you think that X risk to EA is low, or that you aren't able to provide much benefit
      • From a personal career perspective, you might think that other causes give more career flexibility or are just higher impact
    • How does this interact with other causes?
      • Highly interrelated with other causes in the sense that:
        • Many causes are either
          • totally under the umbrella of EA (e.g longtermism)
          • Partly under the umbrella of EA (e.g AI safety, global poverty)
            • This suggests that if EA has some extinction event (loosely defined as everyone hates EA) then this has a huge impact on these causes
      • Also interrelated on a day to day basis
        • community builders likely interact with people in different cause areas, help them make professional/social connections, etc.

    What this cause area most needs

    • This is hard to say, but in general:
      • Talent (rather than money)
      • Expertise in operations
      • People who can think about failure modes of EA
      • People who can reach out to others and build connections

    Other notes