EA Groups Resource Centre
    Home
    πŸ’‘

    Building effective altruism

    Priority ranking
    Understanding
    Related to Readings and resources database (Cause Area)
    Linked pageLinked pageLinked page
    to investigate

    Resources to check out

    Building Effective Altruism β†’ article ~21 min
    The highest-impact career paths our research has identified so far β†’ article ~7 min
    No matter your job, here’s 3 evidence-based ways anyone can have a real impact β†’ article ~17 min
    Models of Community Building β†’ article ~3 min

    Notes

    The argument for working on EA

    • Linked page lays out the case compellingly:
      • multiplier effect: see more here, with the slightly nuanced lens of "being a multiplier"
      • Keeps your options open if the ideas of EA turn out to be wrong (note that I think that this is also a reason to be careful on working on EA)
      • Neglected

    The argument not to (also from Duda 2017)

    πŸ’‘
    I write below each point the info that I think is likely to affect your likelihood of working on this
    • The ideas of EA are correct, or will be badly implemented (likely to be the the community fails to put the ideas of EA into practice)
      • depends on how much you trust the EA community
      • depends on your model of how the EA community works (see Linked page)
    • There is a specific problem that is much more pressing
      • depends on how significant you think longtermism is
    • There is a better opportunity for advocacy
      • depends on how sure you are that a given cause area is the best one
    • There is a better way to gain flexibility
      • depends on how much you think
        • gaining career capital early in career (e.g. by working in a non-EA aligned company) is valuable
        • working on other directly EA internventions gives you flexibility
    • Widespread promotion of the current ideas of effective altruism may be premature (ideas will change)
      • how much will ideas change?

    What sub-tracks are there within working on EA?

    • Being a public intellectual
    • Being involved in operations
      • see Linked page
    • Running an EA group
    • Being involved in some large EA non-profit
    • Promoting EA on the side
    • Earn to give to EA orgs

    Cause Prioritization considerations

    • What causes is this cause more important than?
      • I think that there is a strong case to be made, that this is the most important cause area. This argument goes something like
        • Most of the expected value of EA as a movement is in the future, as EA ideas mature
        • Thus, being a community builder who reduces X risk to EA is v high impact because even reducing EA X risk by 0.01% increases expected value a lot
    • What causes could be more important that this?
      • From a high level cause cause comparison perspective, other causes would be more important if you think that X risk to EA is low, or that you aren't able to provide much benefit
      • From a personal career perspective, you might think that other causes give more career flexibility or are just higher impact
    • How does this interact with other causes?
      • Highly interrelated with other causes in the sense that:
        • Many causes are either
          • totally under the umbrella of EA (e.g longtermism)
          • Partly under the umbrella of EA (e.g AI safety, global poverty)
            • This suggests that if EA has some extinction event (loosely defined as everyone hates EA) then this has a huge impact on these causes
      • Also interrelated on a day to day basis
        • community builders likely interact with people in different cause areas, help them make professional/social connections, etc.

    What this cause area most needs

    • This is hard to say, but in general:
      • Talent (rather than money)
      • Expertise in operations
      • People who can think about failure modes of EA
      • People who can reach out to others and build connections

    Other notes