Last updated: 4th October, 2023
- 1. AI Safety Fundamentals (Technical or Governance)
- 2. Career Programs
- 3. Career Co-working
- 4. In-Depth Fellowship
- 5. Reading Groups
- 6. Animal Welfare / Alternative Proteins Fellowships
- 7. Global Health and Poverty
- 8. Longtermism / X-Risk
- 9. Semi-Exhaustive Syllabi Collection
- 10. Podcast discussions*
- 11. Biosecurity
Disclaimer: many of the options listed below are in a fellowship format: they consist of readings and discussion groups. We endorse these as high-fidelity ways to transfer information; however, we want to highlight that project-based work can also be valuable. We think the impact from these projects comes largely from the development of organisers and participants. This development might be their understanding of (our best guess at) impact-relevant ideas and opportunities and how to strengthen the group/community. We encourage you to think about this if you consider project-based work. We think it’s worth noting that one of the biggest downsides/faliure modes of trying to run projects is the high project-management overhead. Projects can often be unsuccessful when participants are not extremely motivated or when the project manager is not extremely competent.
1. AI Safety Fundamentals (Technical or Governance)
Length: 2-4 hours per week; 7 weeks
Pros: (i) Has ‘check your understanding’ flashcards for each reading; (ii) course is created by world-leading experts in the field; (iii) assumes no prior knowledge.
Cons: (i) Weekly discussion are intended to be held with an expert: if you do not have a facilitator with high levels of understanding these discussions may be far less useful (ii) is intellectually challenging and some people report not completing the course because of this.
Syllabi:
AISF2. Career Programs
Length: 1-2 hours per week; 5 weeks. *** There are three paths, which can be run simultaneously or one-after-the-other; hence, the program could end up being 15 weeks long if you choose.
Pros: (i) Is a guided program through 80,000 Hours’ career planning document; (ii) has strong accountability mechanisms; (iii) can be personalised to individual group members’ tastes
Cons: (i) People will be be doing different things so it may be hard to keep track of progress for all your group members; (ii) impact depends on individuals being motivated and active: they cannot passively read and turn up to discussion groups.
Syllabi:
Career planning program3. Career Co-working
Length: Optional; we recommend at least 4 weeks
Pros: (i) is very flexible and can be modified easily to fit diverse member and group requirements; (ii) allows for extremely personalised development given lack of structure; (iii) can be incorporated in a more social and informal setting
Cons: (i) has potential to be low-impact if not run well; (ii) is hindered if there is not at least one strong and experienced group organiser to give guidance in times of uncertainty; (iii) goals must be set by organiser and individuals as opposed to being given
Further information and syllabi:
Career co-working4. In-Depth Fellowship
Length: 1-2 hours per week; 8 weeks
Pros: (i) allows fellows to explore EA ideas in a more detailed manner where they are not simply being introduced to concepts; (ii) is very structured and easy to run
Cons: (i) is not particularly directed at specific goals; (ii) fellows may feel they are having similar conversations to those they have already had - some fellows have reported not finding it very useful because they already thought deeply about EA ideas in their intro fellowship
Further information and syllabi:
In-Depth Fellowship5. Reading Groups
Length: Optional, usually 4-8 weeks
Pros: (i) very easy to run; (ii) participants can choose (with guidance) which book they read which is motivating
Cons: (i) often, much of the information from reading a book can be acquired through summaries, so it may not be the most efficient use of time to read an entire book; (ii) it is hard to transition to something different if participants are not enjoying it
Further information and syllabi:
Reading groups6. Animal Welfare / Alternative Proteins Fellowships
Length: 1-2 hours per week; 5, 8 or 12 weeks, depending on the option you choose
Pros: (i) is very structured and easy to run;
Cons: (i) is specified to a specific cause area so does not allow for cause exploration and prioritisation
Further information and syllabi
Animal Welfare Fellowships7. Global Health and Poverty
Length: 1-2 hours per week; 4 weeks
Pros: (i) is very structured and easy to run;
Cons: (i) is specified to a specific cause area so does not allow for cause exploration and prioritisation
Further information and syylabi:
Global health and poverty fellowship8. Longtermism / X-Risk
Length: 1-2 hours per week; 8 weeks
Pros: (i) is very structured and easy to run;
Cons: (i) is specified to a specific cause area so does not allow for cause exploration and prioritisation
Further information and syylabi:
Longtermism / Existential Risks9. Semi-Exhaustive Syllabi Collection
Semi-Exhaustive Syllabi Collection10. Podcast discussions*
Length: 1-5 hours per week, lenght of your choice
Pros: (i) accesible in different platforms, easy to structure
Cons: (i) quality variation, can be challenging to make it engaging
*We don’t have a syllabi suggestion, but you can check out 80k’s podcast to get inspired.
11. Biosecurity
You can review Biosecurity Fundamentals’ Pandemic Course, which presents a perspective on the biosecurity field that focuses on mitigating the risk from the most catastrophic pandemics (e.g. COVID-19 or worse).